![]() ![]() Some software has the ability to align these through manually adding control points (Hugin). Stitching single images of mostly blur often means they get left out with the software mentioned so far. I find it easy to use, fast to process and it has the best projection options that I have seen, even emulating a perspective correction lens (shift lens). My personal favourite currently is Microsoft ICE. Photoshop has the ability to stitch RAW files so that might be a good option if you’re going for extreme quality, but bear in mind that even 6 megapixel images will make final results in the hundreds of megapixels, so you may not need it. Photoshop is better at masking and blending, covering for slight mis-alignments Photoshop failed to stitch 18 images here (top corners) Uncompressed TIF files made Photoshop ~15% slower (ICE had no slowdown) Setting a scratch disc in Photoshop (2nd SSD) made it even slower (~3%) Photoshop sometimes performs worse on AMD regardless of speed Photoshop is 3-6x slower than ICE (depending on RAM & CPU) ![]() ICE is efficeint with RAM & impressively performant when RAM runs out Photoshop uses up to twice as much RAM, if it's available Using 1/4 resolution images is recommended. Super fast SSDs required being plugged, but didn't make a big difference Plugging the laptops in resulted in a modest ~10% improvement "Best Power Efficiency" was a noticeable ~30% slower "Balanced" battery mode was used for the above results Neither software uses the GPU and SSD speeds are not very important The speed is mostly down to the CPU, RAM helps out a little These laptops are thin/light ultrabooks, no dedicated graphics (GPU) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |